Critical Examination Of Effectiveness Of Hardline Foreign Policy Tactics: The Challenge Of Role Of Global Pressures In Addressing Human Rights Concerns
Ass. Professor Orie, Sylvester Okorie, PhD, MSc, MPA, MBA, PGD, BSc, CNA, FCNA, FNIM, FCAI.
Department of Public Administration & Policy Studies, Tansian University Umunya, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Keywords: Sanctions, Humanitarianism, Diplomacy, Globalization, Sovereignty, Accountability
Abstract
This study undertakes a critical examination of the efficacy of hardline foreign policy tactics, with a particular focus on their impact on global governance and international relations. The broad objective of this research is to investigate the consequences of employing hardline tactics in international relations and to identify potential alternatives that can promote peace, stability, and cooperation among nations. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods. The study drew on a range of sources, including academic journals, books, and policy reports, as well as primary data collected from international organizations and government agencies. Data analysis was facilitated by the use of statistical software, including SPSS and R. The study applies the realist theory of international relations, which posits that states are primarily motivated by self-interest and security concerns. The strategies and techniques adopted in this study include content analysis, case studies, and comparative analysis. Furthermore, the study utilizes the Yaro Yamane formula to determine the sample size for quantitative analysis. The findings of this study reveal that hardline foreign policy tactics can have significant and far-reaching consequences, including humanitarian crises, economic instability, and damage to international relationships. Specifically, economic sanctions can have devastating impacts on civilian populations, hardline tactics can undermine international cooperation and diplomacy, and alternative approaches, such as diplomacy and negotiation, can be more effective in achieving foreign policy objectives. Based on these findings, the study recommends that policymakers exercise caution and consideration when employing hardline tactics, prioritize diplomacy and international cooperation, and consider the potential consequences of their actions on vulnerable populations. In conclusion, this study provides compelling evidence that hardline foreign policy tactics are a double-edged sword that can have far-reaching and devastating consequences, and it is imperative that policymakers adopt a more nuanced and thoughtful approach to international relations.